![]() ![]() Change for the sake of change is questionable at best, but change primarily for the purpose of profiting is often worse. They are not the target of a new edition.īefore quickly labeling dissenters as "grumpy veterans," perhaps those that are so eager to accept this new edition should consider that many of these "grumpy veterans" have been around the block a few times with GW's games and business model and have learned to be wary of the promises of a "better" "perfected" new ruleset. Grumpy veterans will always see change as a bad thing, after all. As long as GW puts new stuff, it just means the game keeps being supported.Īs for who wants new rules.I'd say new players. What's the difference between a supported game and one that is left to fans is that the supported game is.supported. Who wants more teams? How many teams is enough? We have 31 teams already, now GW is piling on 2 more. Baxx wrote: I'm curious to know, did anyone want a new edition? And if yes, why? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |